INFORMATIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

Machine learning methods with increased tolerance to skips and noise of sensory data for predictive quality management in the continuous production of food biologics

Authors

  • Kirill Yu. Zhigalov https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8104-2947 V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Management Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 Profsoyuznaya str., Moscow, 117997, Russia
EDN: EPGVFD

How to cite

GOST Zhigalov K. Y. Machine learning methods with increased tolerance to skips and noise of sensory data for predictive quality management in the continuous production of food biologics // Bakery of Russia. 2025. Vol. 69. No. 3-4. P. 36-44.
APA Zhigalov, K. Y. (2025). Machine learning methods with increased tolerance to skips and noise of sensory data for predictive quality management in the continuous production of food biologics. Bakery of Russia, 69(3-4), 36-44.

Abstract

The article examines the construction of robust machine learning models for predictive quality management in continuous food biotechnological processes, where the time series of sensory measurements are systematically distorted by omissions, outliers, and non-Gaussian noise caused by sensor contamination, sterilization cycles, and laboratory sampling features. Based on the 24-month monitoring of a continuous fermentation line for probiotic crops (45 physical sensors in 1-minute increments and laboratory parameters of biomass quality with an interval of 4 hours; over 1.05 million timestamps), it is shown that the dispersion contribution of hardware interference dominates technological variability, which is confirmed by a sharp increase in the signal-to-noise ratio after filtering and a pronounced «heavy tail» distribution for critical parameters such as pH and dissolved oxygen. A computational scheme is proposed that combines robust feature scaling, temporal cross-validation without leakage of future information, optimization by the Huber loss function, and a comparative analysis of skip recovery methods (MICE, k-NN, simple heuristics) with neural network recovery based on a noise-canceling autoencoder and a hybrid approach that takes into account spatial and temporal correlations between channels. It has been demonstrated that the autoencoder significantly reduces the RMSE reconstruction error for temperature, pH, pressure, and substrate flow, achieving accuracy comparable to measurement error, and the recurrent LSTM model with an attention mechanism maintains acceptable accuracy in predicting biomass concentrations with data degradation up to 40% skips, surpassing linear and ensemble basic methods. Additionally, the saturation effect was revealed: further improvement of signal quality below the threshold of about 35 dB SNR gives a limited increase in predictive accuracy, which makes it possible to justify economically rational requirements for the measuring subsystem and computing resources when implementing digital twins and predictive sensor network maintenance.

Keywords

machine learning attacks on models counteraction methods data security comparative analysis

References

Bashirov M.G., Lyusov R.S., Akchurin D.Sh. Applied application of machine learning to assess the technical condition and predict the resource of oil and gas equipment // South Siberian Scientific bulletin. 2023. № 3(49). pp. 131-138.

Blagodatov V.V., Kravtsov A.S., Nuikin A.V. Machine learning for analyzing side channels of cryptographic chips // Nanoindustry. 2020. № S96-2. pp. 528-530.

Vorobyov A.V. A method for selecting a machine learning model based on predictor stability using the Shapley value. // Economy. Computer science. 2021. Vol. 48. № 2. pp. 350-359.

Grebenkina A.A., Andreev M.D., Nikolaeva A.V., Polomoshnov S.A., Krivetsky V.V. Stabilization of the response of semiconductor gas MEMS sensors using machine learning methods // Nanoindustry. 2025. Vol. 18. № S12-1. pp. 18-23.

Guselev A.M., Marshalko G.B. Security problems of machine learning systems // Methods and technical means of ensuring information security. 2021. № 30. pp. 23-24.

Ivanova N. A., Voyachek S. A. Control of the uniformity of biometric images in the training sample by observing the effect of loss of stability of the training regime // Neurocomputers: development, application. 2009. № 6. pp. 22-24.

Cleary L. Fundamentals of Azure machine learning // Windows 2000 Magazine/Re. 2017. № 8. P. 34.

Kotelnikov N.A. Comparison of methods of countering attacks on machine learning methods // Coll-n of selec. art. of the scien. session of TUSUR. 2024. № 1-3. pp. 52-54.

Kukareko A.V., Nesterenkov S. N. Machine learning methods for detecting errors in performing exercises on a smart simulator // Big Data and Advanced Analytics. 2020. № 6-2. pp. 214-224.

Mokhov V.A. Algorithm for targeted formation of a training sample // News of higher educational institutions. The North Caucasus region. Technical sciences. 2005. № S2. pp. 73-76.

Namiot D.E., Ilyushin E.A., Chizhov I.V. Grounds for work on sustainable machine learning // International journal of open information technologies. 2021. Vol. 9. № 11. pp. 68-74.

Namiot D.E., Ilyushin E.A., Chizhov I.V. Current academic and industrial projects dedicated to sustainable machine learning // International journal of open information technologies. 2021. Vol. 9. № 10. pp. 35-46.

Orlov A. Machine learning for big data // Open systems. DBMS. 2016. № 1. pp. 26-27.

Shoven F. Integration of statistical process control and machine learning methods in quality assurance engineering practice on highly variable production lines // Environmental management issues. 2025. Vol. 4. № 6. pp. 60-68.

Yakubovich V.A. Machines learning pattern recognition // St. Petersburg University bulletin. Mathematics. Mechanics. Astronomy. 2021. Vol. 8. № 4. pp. 625-638.

Issue

Section

INFORMATIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

Metrics

1 views
0 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article

Machine-readable metadata

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.